Assortment reviews

A method built for channel-split ranges

Our flagship Omnichannel Assortment Review follows a fixed sequence so category owners know what arrives each week — and what decisions the final workshop is meant to settle.

Retail analysts comparing printed channel charts on a large work table

Why reviews are sequenced this way

Merchandising teams in Thailand often hold store and online ownership in different rooms. Averaging sell-through hides the SKUs that carry one channel and drain the other. We keep the channels visible side by side until the workshop forces a choice.

The sequence below is the same whether you manage fashion, home, or specialty hardlines — only the category trees and calendars change.

Typical window

Three to five weeks

Shorter when extracts are clean and category trees are already shared. Longer when online and store taxonomies need reconciliation first.

Review sequence

Each step produces a visible artefact the team can challenge before the next one begins.

Scope and data readiness

We agree category coverage, channel definitions, and which sell-through windows matter for the next buy. You leave with a short checklist of extracts and owners.

Channel and assortment mapping

We align SKUs and clusters across store and online labels, then flag gaps where ranges diverge without a stated reason.

Visual narrative drafting

Charts and storyboards show winners, stalls, and markdown pressure by channel — written for trading meetings, not research archives.

Decision workshop and handoff

Category owners lock prioritized moves, assign owners, and receive a written pack for the buying cycle.

Full review scope Request an assortment review